On March 25, 2009 Fort Bend County agreed to waive the market valuation. I voted against the waiver, but lost the vote 3-2. Under Senate Bill 792, any county that votes to waive has until September 25, 2009 to exercise the local option on the Grand Parkway. What is the "local option", you ask?
The local option essentially means that the local entity (Fort Bend County in this case) gets to develop the project itself. The County now has two years from the date that the environmental is completed to enter a contract for the construction (design, right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, etc.) of the project. If such a contract is executed then the project remains in control of the local entity.
If Fort Bend did not exercise the local option then the option to develop the Grand Parkway goes to TxDOT and would likely result in the County completely losing control of the project. TxDOT would probably execute a Comprehensive Development Agreement (CDA) with a private company and the County would have no say so or input.
I believe that voting for the local option gives the County as much control over the Grand Parkway as we can get. That's why I voted for the local option.
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
PRECINCT 1 TO GET STIMULUS FOR TRANSPORTATION
Here is a list (see p. 4) of stimulus projects in Precinct 1 added by TxDOT last week. FM 2218 and 1640 are on the list as well as US 59 at FM 360. These were added because the projects letting were coming in under budget. This is great news for Richmond, Rosenberg and west Fort Bend County.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Barbar Jordan Park in Needville
Monday, August 17, 2009
CRABB RIVER ROAD, FM 762 and the new GEORGE RANCH HIGH SCHOOL
I am seeking the support of my neighbors in Greatwood, Tara, Canyon Gate, Bridlewood Estates, Brazos Lakes and Brazos Gardens to widen Crabb River Road and FM 762 as it passes by the new high school. The project is more fully described below:
FM 2759 (Crabb River Road) will be widened from and existing 3-lane open ditch to a 4-lane divided curb and gutter from US 59 continuing 3.4 miles through the intersection of FM 762 terminating 500 feet south of the new LCISD high school/middle school site and secondary school complex. This continuous 4-lane facility will pass through the city limits of Rosenberg and the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Sugar Land and the City of Thompsons.
The project includes these additional improvements:
· Constructing a four-lane depressed section of through lanes, including on/off ramps along FM 2759 at Sansbury Blvd (Sansbury will remain at-grade) and
· Constructing a grade separation at FM 2759 and FM 762 over the BNSF Railroad with turning lanes.
I know each of you is already aware of the traffic backup on Crabb River Road and of the severe traffic problem that will be created along FM 762 when the George Ranch High School complex opens next year. I believe this project will solve both of these issues as well as afford additional safety to the traveling public by eliminating the at-grade crossing of the BNSF line.
The County seeks funding for this project under a new competitive federal grant called a TIGER Grant. I have already requested a STIP revision. in accordance with HGAC’s guidelines under the TIGER Grant Program, A draft Environmental Assessment will be submitted to TxDOT for review and forwarded to FHWA in January 2010. I anticipate receiving a FONSI by May 2011. If approved, I believe construction will be completed by December 2012 at a total project cost between $70 and $80 million.
Because Fort Bend County will be competing with 1000’s of applications from around the United States, I am trying to make our application as appealing as possible by funding 20% or $14 to $16 million of the project cost. We have a commitment from TxDOT to use a $7 million credit from the previous work completed at US 59 overpass at SH 99 for utilities and right of way costs associated with this project. Sugar Land and Rosenberg have also indicated a willingness to help fund this project. I have requested a donation from the George Foundation of the right of way required for the southern portion of the project along FM 762. All in all, I think we are well on our way to sewing up our 20% share.
One of the requirements of the TIGER Grant application is to submit as many resolutions and letters of support from local and state governments, as well as non-profits, community organizations and individuals as possible. I have received the support of the local state offices of TxDOT, as well as the City of Sugar Land and the City of Thompsons. I am requesting your support. This item will be placed on the August 25, 2009 Agenda of Commissioner’s Court. Please show up at the Travis Building (301 Jackson St., 7th Floor, Richmond, Texas) at 12:45 pm to sign up and speak on its behalf or call Judge Hebert’s Office at 281-341-8634 and let him know you support this project.
I made this project a priority in my election campaign and I once again ask your support to make it a reality. I eagerly await your support, and appreciate your consideration of this request.
Email me your questions and/or comments at:
richard.morrison@co.fort-bend.tx.us
Call my office at:
281-344-9400
Friday, March 6, 2009
CUT THE FAT
One job of the Commissioner's Court is to set the county's budget. Now that the press has reported it, I can tell you that Fort Bend has targeted a 10% cut in its budget on non-salaried items. Salaried items will be frozen at last year's budget levels. In our pre-bugdet talks, my office will meet this projections. And I am going to do my best to see that the rest of the county does the same.
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
A MODEST PROPOSAL
As many of you know I am against tolling the Grand Parkway. There has been some action on this issue here in Fort Bend County and statewide.
Senate Bill 792 states that market valuation means a project valuation that is based on agreed project terms and conditions, including initial toll rate and toll rate escalation methods. It takes account of the project traffic and revenue study, using agreed upon assumptions, an agreed project scope, market research, estimated costs of project finance, construction, operation and maintenance. SB 792 also allows the market valuation agreement to be waived.
In other words a market valuation is a financial-type appraisal that establishes the net monetary value of a toll project based on its expected revenues (from tolls and other sources) and its costs (financing, construction, and O&M) over the time frame established by the term of the agreement. Its an important tool to check the financial viability of toll projects.
The objective of the Market Valuation appears to be the quantification of the economic potential of a toll project. The way I read the statute, the market valuation study is the line of defense for common sense in funding these toll projects. It this requirement is waived, the Grand Parkway can be built as a tollroad whether it makes economic sense or not.
Texas stands to receive $2.25 billion in transportation funding from Washington, D.C. This funding is critical to maintain and upgrade our transportation infrastructure in Texas. It is also critical to stimulate the Texas economy. It will create jobs starting with the engineers who design these roads to the construction crews who build them.
The Texas Transportation Commission (TxDoT), appointed by Gov. Perry, has recommended that the East Region; including Beaumont, Bryan, Houston and Lufkin receive $431,516,770 for transportation projects. From this amount over 53%, or $231,000,000, will be spent on the construction of toll roads. These recommendations ignore the federal law that requires these funds to be spent in economically distressed areas and ignore the will of ordinary Texans who are opposed to our tax dollars being spent on Toll Roads and see these schemes as a type of double taxation.
Fort Bend has consistently been one of the fastest growing counties in the country for the last ten years. As a County Commissioner in Fort Bend County, I am on the front lines of mobility issues on a daily basis. Many of my constituents have a deep distrust of government and these actions by TxDoT only confirm that distrust. Since TxDoT’s recent recommendations I have been asked, ‘how is it that tax dollars will be spent on a road that will also be tolled’ and ‘aren’t roads that are paid for with tax dollars usually free?’ These are valid questions that Gov. Perry should be required to explain.
Unfortunately, Gov. Perry has taken the position that toll roads are the preferred method of financing our public roads in Texas. And many of our current mobility projects have been designed according to this policy. Tolling the Grand Parkway is a prime example of the shortsightedness of TxDoT and our regional planners. Powerful interest with goals other than mobility have been pushing this “outer-loop” for over 30 years and ignoring the other long-term mobility needs of the area. As a result, Segment E is one of the few “shovel-ready” projects in the Houston-Galveston area.
Now this shortsightedness is finally bearing fruit. If Segment E is funded from the stimulus money and finally constructed, exorbitant tolls from this segment will be used to finance and construct the remaining segments in Liberty, Montgomery, Brazoria, Chambers, and Galveston Counties. That means the citizens of Fort Bend County and North-west Harris County will be paying for those segments even though they never drive on them. From a mobility standpoint many of these remaining segments are useless. Miles and miles of the remaining pieces will cross open prairie where no one lives, will have little or no effect on traffic and are not needed. When our transportation dollars from Washington D.C. are desperately needed to get people to and from our population centers, it only seems reasonable that the federal stimulus money should be spent on actual mobility projects.
A solution to this ridiculous dilemma is for Gov. Perry to show some courage and demand that the legislature index the gasoline tax to inflation. After all, the gasoline tax is one of the fairer taxes, ‘the more you drive, the more you pay.’ Of course, if the Legislature decides to pass this tax, it must also insure that all of the tax revenue raised from gasoline taxes will be spent on roads. It can no longer be raided for other needs of the State. Gov. Perry should take a leadership role in making sure this happens. It will take courage, but it is the right thing for Texas.
In the mean time I will continue my crusade against tolling the Grand Parkway. There will be more opportunities in the future to kill this project. I thank you for your help.
Senate Bill 792 states that market valuation means a project valuation that is based on agreed project terms and conditions, including initial toll rate and toll rate escalation methods. It takes account of the project traffic and revenue study, using agreed upon assumptions, an agreed project scope, market research, estimated costs of project finance, construction, operation and maintenance. SB 792 also allows the market valuation agreement to be waived.
In other words a market valuation is a financial-type appraisal that establishes the net monetary value of a toll project based on its expected revenues (from tolls and other sources) and its costs (financing, construction, and O&M) over the time frame established by the term of the agreement. Its an important tool to check the financial viability of toll projects.
The objective of the Market Valuation appears to be the quantification of the economic potential of a toll project. The way I read the statute, the market valuation study is the line of defense for common sense in funding these toll projects. It this requirement is waived, the Grand Parkway can be built as a tollroad whether it makes economic sense or not.
Texas stands to receive $2.25 billion in transportation funding from Washington, D.C. This funding is critical to maintain and upgrade our transportation infrastructure in Texas. It is also critical to stimulate the Texas economy. It will create jobs starting with the engineers who design these roads to the construction crews who build them.
The Texas Transportation Commission (TxDoT), appointed by Gov. Perry, has recommended that the East Region; including Beaumont, Bryan, Houston and Lufkin receive $431,516,770 for transportation projects. From this amount over 53%, or $231,000,000, will be spent on the construction of toll roads. These recommendations ignore the federal law that requires these funds to be spent in economically distressed areas and ignore the will of ordinary Texans who are opposed to our tax dollars being spent on Toll Roads and see these schemes as a type of double taxation.
Fort Bend has consistently been one of the fastest growing counties in the country for the last ten years. As a County Commissioner in Fort Bend County, I am on the front lines of mobility issues on a daily basis. Many of my constituents have a deep distrust of government and these actions by TxDoT only confirm that distrust. Since TxDoT’s recent recommendations I have been asked, ‘how is it that tax dollars will be spent on a road that will also be tolled’ and ‘aren’t roads that are paid for with tax dollars usually free?’ These are valid questions that Gov. Perry should be required to explain.
Unfortunately, Gov. Perry has taken the position that toll roads are the preferred method of financing our public roads in Texas. And many of our current mobility projects have been designed according to this policy. Tolling the Grand Parkway is a prime example of the shortsightedness of TxDoT and our regional planners. Powerful interest with goals other than mobility have been pushing this “outer-loop” for over 30 years and ignoring the other long-term mobility needs of the area. As a result, Segment E is one of the few “shovel-ready” projects in the Houston-Galveston area.
Now this shortsightedness is finally bearing fruit. If Segment E is funded from the stimulus money and finally constructed, exorbitant tolls from this segment will be used to finance and construct the remaining segments in Liberty, Montgomery, Brazoria, Chambers, and Galveston Counties. That means the citizens of Fort Bend County and North-west Harris County will be paying for those segments even though they never drive on them. From a mobility standpoint many of these remaining segments are useless. Miles and miles of the remaining pieces will cross open prairie where no one lives, will have little or no effect on traffic and are not needed. When our transportation dollars from Washington D.C. are desperately needed to get people to and from our population centers, it only seems reasonable that the federal stimulus money should be spent on actual mobility projects.
A solution to this ridiculous dilemma is for Gov. Perry to show some courage and demand that the legislature index the gasoline tax to inflation. After all, the gasoline tax is one of the fairer taxes, ‘the more you drive, the more you pay.’ Of course, if the Legislature decides to pass this tax, it must also insure that all of the tax revenue raised from gasoline taxes will be spent on roads. It can no longer be raided for other needs of the State. Gov. Perry should take a leadership role in making sure this happens. It will take courage, but it is the right thing for Texas.
In the mean time I will continue my crusade against tolling the Grand Parkway. There will be more opportunities in the future to kill this project. I thank you for your help.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
IS FORT BEND SINKING?
Subsidence is an issue on the Gulf Coast.
A subdivsion in Baytown has been turned into a park because it sunk and is now underwater.
The Fort Bend Subsidence District was created by the Texas Legislature in 1988 with the intent to study and prevent subsidence in Fort Bend. I was at the Rose/Rich Chamber of Commerce Infrastructure Meeting on Wednesday morning when I saw a presentation from the Subsidence District.
The County is split into three areas.
Precinct 1 covers everything south and west of the Brazos. It also includes Sienna Plantation from the Brazos north to McKeever Road, Teal Run, Fresno and Arcola.
The next slide shows that most of the pumping of groundwater is in Area A. The Richmond/Rosenberg Subarea and Area B have remained fairly constant over the years.
The current plan is for Area A to reduce its groundwater usage 30% by 2013 (2015 for the Rich/Rose subarea) and 60% by 2025. Area B is exempt from conversion. As the Commissioner of the largest rural precinct in Fort Bend, I will represent the interest of the farmers and ranchers to make sure that Area B remains exempt.
Land subsidence is sinking of the land surface. The elevation of the land surface is lowered by compressing the many layers of clay beneath the land surface. In the greater Houston area, land subsidence is caused by the withdrawal of groundwater. When we pump large amounts of groundwater from the aquifers beneath us, we pull water out of the many layers of clay, which allows the clay to compact under the weight of everything above them.
A subdivsion in Baytown has been turned into a park because it sunk and is now underwater.
The Fort Bend Subsidence District was created by the Texas Legislature in 1988 with the intent to study and prevent subsidence in Fort Bend. I was at the Rose/Rich Chamber of Commerce Infrastructure Meeting on Wednesday morning when I saw a presentation from the Subsidence District.
The County is split into three areas.
Precinct 1 covers everything south and west of the Brazos. It also includes Sienna Plantation from the Brazos north to McKeever Road, Teal Run, Fresno and Arcola.
The next slide shows that most of the pumping of groundwater is in Area A. The Richmond/Rosenberg Subarea and Area B have remained fairly constant over the years.
The current plan is for Area A to reduce its groundwater usage 30% by 2013 (2015 for the Rich/Rose subarea) and 60% by 2025. Area B is exempt from conversion. As the Commissioner of the largest rural precinct in Fort Bend, I will represent the interest of the farmers and ranchers to make sure that Area B remains exempt.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
.JPG)